Graph Plotting Worksheet

Laboratory Worksheet: Plotting Graphs with Error Bars

Objective

To learn how to plot a graph for a given set of data with proper choice of scales and error bars, and understand the significance of error analysis in scientific measurements.

Introduction

Graphical representation of data is an essential skill in scientific experimentation. Proper plotting techniques help in visualizing relationships between variables, identifying trends, and validating theoretical models. Error bars provide a visual representation of the uncertainty in measurements, which is crucial for determining the reliability of experimental results.

In scientific research, no measurement is complete without an estimate of its uncertainty. Error bars represent this uncertainty graphically. They extend from each data point and indicate the range within which the true value likely lies.

Two types of errors are typically considered:

  • Systematic errors: These arise from calibration issues or experimental setup flaws. They consistently affect measurements in the same direction.
  • Random errors: These result from inherent limitations in measurement precision and vary randomly in direction and magnitude.

The width of error bars typically represents one standard deviation (\( \sigma \)) or standard error, though sometimes the 95% confidence interval is used.

Materials Required

  • Graph paper (preferably millimeter)
  • Ruler and pencil
  • Calculator
  • Experimental data sets
  • Computer with spreadsheet software (optional)

Theory

Standard Deviation and Error Calculation

For a set of measurements \(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n\) with mean \(\bar{x}\), the standard deviation is given by:

\[ \sigma = \sqrt{\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}(x_i - \bar{x})^2}{n-1}} \]

Standard Error of the Mean

The standard error of the mean (SEM) is calculated as:

\[ \text{SEM} = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}} \]

Error Propagation Rules

When combining measurements with uncertainties, errors propagate according to specific rules:

For addition and subtraction: \( Z = X \pm Y \)

\[ \Delta Z = \sqrt{(\Delta X)^2 + (\Delta Y)^2} \]

For multiplication and division: \( Z = X \times Y \) or \( Z = \frac{X}{Y} \)

\[ \frac{\Delta Z}{Z} = \sqrt{\left(\frac{\Delta X}{X}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{\Delta Y}{Y}\right)^2} \]

For power functions: \( Z = X^n \)

\[ \frac{\Delta Z}{Z} = |n| \cdot \frac{\Delta X}{X} \]

Sample Data Set

Consider the following data set that measures the relationship between the applied force (F) and the extension (x) of a spring:

Force F (N) ± 0.05 N Extension x (cm) ± 0.1 cm
0.00 0.00
0.50 2.45
1.00 4.90
1.50 7.32
2.00 9.78
2.50 12.23

Procedure: Step-by-Step Guide to Plotting with Error Bars

Step 1: Determine the Range of the Variables

Identify the minimum and maximum values of both the independent and dependent variables.

From our sample data:

  • Force ranges from 0.00 N to 2.50 N
  • Extension ranges from 0.00 cm to 12.23 cm

To allow for error bars and some margin, we'll set our axes to:

  • x-axis (Force): 0 to 3.0 N
  • y-axis (Extension): 0 to 13.0 cm

Step 2: Choose Appropriate Scales

Select scales that make optimal use of the available graph space while ensuring readability.

Guidelines for choosing appropriate scales:

  • The plotted graph should occupy at least 75% of the available graph space.
  • Choose scales that yield convenient, easily readable intervals (e.g., 0.5 N per division for force).
  • Each axis should have 5-10 major divisions.
  • The scale should be linear unless the data clearly indicates a logarithmic relationship.

For our example:

  • x-axis: 0.5 N per division (assuming standard graph paper)
  • y-axis: 2.0 cm of extension per division

Step 3: Calculate Error Values

Determine the magnitude of error bars based on the given uncertainties.

For our example:

  • Force measurement uncertainty: ± 0.05 N (given)
  • Extension measurement uncertainty: ± 0.1 cm (given)

These values will be used directly as the length of the error bars above and below each data point.

For more complex scenarios where multiple measurements are involved, we would use error propagation formulas as shown in the theory section.

Step 4: Draw and Label the Axes

Draw the coordinate axes, marking the scales and labeling them with quantities and units.

Key elements for proper axes:

  • Draw x-axis (horizontal) and y-axis (vertical) with a ruler.
  • Mark regular intervals on each axis according to your chosen scale.
  • Label each axis with the quantity name followed by its unit in parentheses. For example: "Applied Force (N)" and "Extension (cm)".
  • Number the axes clearly, placing the numbers below the x-axis and to the left of the y-axis.

Step 5: Plot the Data Points

Mark each data point precisely on the graph according to the coordinate values.

For best practices:

  • Use a sharp pencil to plot small, distinct points.
  • A small cross (×) or dot with a circle around it (⊙) works well to mark data points.
  • Be precise in positioning each point according to its coordinates.
  • For our sample data, plot each (Force, Extension) pair: (0.00, 0.00), (0.50, 2.45), etc.

Step 6: Draw Error Bars

Add vertical and horizontal error bars to represent the uncertainty in each measurement.

For each data point:

  1. Draw a vertical line extending ± 0.1 cm (the uncertainty in extension) above and below each data point.
  2. Draw a horizontal line extending ± 0.05 N (the uncertainty in force) to the left and right of each data point.
  3. Add small caps at the ends of each error bar to improve readability.

The resulting error bars form a "cross" around each data point, showing the uncertainty in both variables.

Step 7: Determine the Best-Fit Line

Draw a straight line that best represents the trend in the data, accounting for the uncertainties.

Guidelines for drawing the best-fit line:

  • The line should pass as close as possible to all data points, considering their error bars.
  • There should be roughly an equal number of data points above and below the line.
  • For a visual method: place a transparent ruler on the graph and adjust it until you find the position where the line best represents all data points.
  • For our spring example, we expect a linear relationship according to Hooke's Law: F = kx, where k is the spring constant.

Mathematical method for linear fit:

For data points \((x_i, y_i)\) with a linear relationship \(y = mx + c\), the slope \(m\) and intercept \(c\) can be calculated using:

\[ m = \frac{n\sum x_i y_i - \sum x_i \sum y_i}{n\sum x_i^2 - (\sum x_i)^2} \]

\[ c = \frac{\sum y_i - m\sum x_i}{n} \]

Where \(n\) is the number of data points.

Step 8: Calculate the Slope and its Uncertainty

Determine the slope of the best-fit line and its associated uncertainty.

The slope represents the relationship between the variables. For our spring example, the slope gives the spring constant k in N/cm.

To calculate the uncertainty in the slope:

\[ \Delta m = m \cdot \sqrt{\sum \left(\frac{y_i - (mx_i + c)}{y_i}\right)^2 \cdot \frac{1}{n-2}} \]

Or, using a simplified approach for a linear fit through the origin:

\[ \Delta m = \sqrt{\frac{\sum(y_i - mx_i)^2}{(n-1)\sum x_i^2}} \]

For our sample data, this calculation would yield the spring constant k = 4.89 N/cm with an uncertainty of approximately ± 0.02 N/cm.

Step 9: Add a Title and Legend

Complete the graph with a descriptive title and any necessary legend information.

Essential elements:

  • Title: "Relationship Between Force and Extension for a Spring"
  • Include your name, date, and any experiment identification information.
  • If multiple data series are plotted, add a legend explaining each symbol or color used.
  • You may also include the equation of the best-fit line: F = (4.89 ± 0.02)x N/cm

Diagram: Example of a Properly Plotted Graph

Example of a graph with proper scales and error bars

Figure 1: A properly plotted graph showing the relationship between force and extension for a spring, including error bars and best-fit line.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  1. Improper scaling: Using scales that compress or stretch the data unnaturally.
  2. Omitting error bars: Failing to represent the uncertainty in measurements.
  3. Forcing the best-fit line through the origin: Only do this if physical principles require it.
  4. Connecting data points directly: This creates a jagged line that doesn't represent the underlying relationship.
  5. Neglecting units: Axes must be labeled with both quantities and their units.
  6. Inadequate precision: Being careless when plotting points or drawing the best-fit line.

Analysis Questions

  1. How does the inclusion of error bars affect your interpretation of the data?
  2. If two theoretical models predict slightly different relationships, how can proper error analysis help you determine which model better fits your data?
  3. For the spring example, calculate the spring constant and its uncertainty from your graph. How does this compare with the theoretical value?
  4. Discuss how the choice of scale affects the visual interpretation of your results.
  5. Suggest methods to reduce the uncertainties in your measurements.

Conclusion

Proper graphing techniques with appropriate scales and error bars are essential skills in scientific experimentation. They allow for accurate visualization of data relationships and provide a measure of confidence in experimental results. By following the steps outlined in this worksheet, you will be able to create professional-quality graphs that effectively communicate your findings.

Scroll to Top